On the prestigious news and current affairs programme between 7am and 9am she was promulgating all the current received wisdom of this disproportionately influential minority party.
· Nuclear power is not sustainable in the long term,
· Renewable energy can provide all our needs and,
· We don’t need growth because you can have prosperity without economic growth.
The depressing thing in France is that nobody challenges
such statements. Not on the radio at any
rate and the result is that people are at risk of being persuaded that it’s true.
Nuclear Power is Sustainable
With the use of the right technologies, such as liquid
fluoride thorium reactors, nuclear power can be both safe and sustainable for
centuries to come, without increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and
without generating wastes which will still be radioactive in thousands of year’s
time. There are even technologies available
which can safely burn existing nuclear wastes and surplus plutonium stocks, but
they all need political commitment and investment.
Renewable Sources cannot provide all our needs
Renewable energy sources do have a place in the energy mix, I'm even considering an installation myself, but
they cannot be a complete replacement for nuclear power, or power from fossil
fuels, because they either only work during daylight hours, or when it’s windy. There is no suitable storage technology that
will enable sufficient energy storage solely from such sources for our current patterns
of demand. I didn’t hear her mention biofuels but they
need huge areas of land and, unless you live in a country that has thousands of
hectares of unpopulated forest, they are in direct competition with food crops.
German consumers already pay 40% more for their electricity
than consumers in France because they have less nuclear power and are now going
to withdraw from it altogether. They
haven’t yet admitted that there’s a problem of satisfying the base load with
renewables but when they do they will make it up by burning more Russian gas or importing French nuclear electricity! Fortunately they are unlikely to be in direct political
conflict with Putin et al, who have a history of turning off the gas as a political weapon and, however high the price of gas gets, they can
afford it! They are a successful country that
can export its manufactured goods and has sustained higher economic growth over the decades than its
neighbours.
Prosperity without economic growth is a myth
France is not so lucky but Cecile Duflot has an answer to
that as well, “prosperity without economic growth”. Even that might be possible in an unconnected
world where we all lived in our own small isolated communities. I suppose it would be rather like after the
romans left, no economic growth but just
lots of invasions. Between
successive waves of wars and invasions there was a form of prosperity, if you could call being able to feed yourself and stay alive until the Black Death arrived, being prosperous.
Somewhat more recently we saw what happened to communist regimes following over seventy years of stifling dogma and the cold war, both of which had the effect of restricting economic growth. Eastern European countries are still living with the economic and political legacy.
Somewhat more recently we saw what happened to communist regimes following over seventy years of stifling dogma and the cold war, both of which had the effect of restricting economic growth. Eastern European countries are still living with the economic and political legacy.
Oh sorry! You want an
army to defend your borders, a better health service, state subsidies for failing industries and more social protection
but all without economic growth to pay for it.
Clearly we need another revolution!
So if you want to pay at least 40% more for your
electricity, you think economic growth is a bad thing and you have no children
or grandchildren who will need jobs in the future, then vote for Europe Ecology. You know it makes sense!
0 comments:
Post a Comment