European Citizens Initiative to halt TTIP (TAFTA) and CETA Trade Deals Rejected
The European Commission has rejected
the registration of a European
Citizens Initiative (ECI) to stop the secretive negotiations concerning the
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with the USA and also to stop
the ratification of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with Canada.
An online petition to support
the ECI has attracted more than 600,000 signatures so far and the European Commission’s
rejection of the Initiative, with its attendant publicity, is surely an own goal which will lead to even more
public concern and also fuel support for Eurosceptic groups who are attracting
more and more votes in many European countries.
The text of the ECI was as
follows:
"We invite the European Commission to recommend to the Council to
repeal the negotiating mandate for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment
Partnership (TTIP) and not to conclude the Comprehensive Economic and Trade
Agreement (CETA)"
The application was submitted under the rules established by the Lisbon Treaty in 2012 for a”European Citizens Initiative”. It was rejected by the EU Commission on the grounds that, although negotiations for these wide ranging trade agreements are proceeding in line with mandates written by the EU Trade Commissioner and agreed by the member states, there was no “act” by the Commission which could be reversed. A second reason was that negative ECI’s are not valid. (See the EU's reasons for rejection here).
Michael Efler, contact person for the ECI, which currently represents almost 230 organizations from 21 EU countries, said:
“Now the battle really begins. The rejection
of the ECI only confirms the Commission’s strategy to exclude citizens and
parliaments from the TTIP and CETA negotiations. Instead of paying attention to
citizens, it is just lobbyists that are being listened to.”
“In its
rejection of the ECI, the European Commission claims that the negotiating
mandates on TTIP and CETA are not legal acts but internal preparatory acts between
EU institutions and therefore not contestable via an ECI.
The
Commission’s view that only acts with an effect on third parties are
permissible for an ECI is obviously a legal error. The negotiating mandate of
the Commission is a formal decision of the Council and therefore a legal act.
If the Commission’s legal opinion had any substance, then in plain English this
would mean that Europe’s population is excluded from participation in the
development of any kind of international agreements – information that is as
frightening as it is scandalous,” according to Efler.
What’s
more, the Commission claims that it cannot make negative ratification proposals
and therefore cannot comply with the ECI demand not to conclude the CETA and
TTIP negotiations. “Contrariwise, this means that citizens can only applaud
international negotiations carried out by the Commission, but not criticize
them,” said Efler.
This means that the EU Commission, as well as conducting negotiations in secret, wishes to stifle any participation
by citizens' groups in such trade negotiations.
“Apparently
the Commission is afraid of this ECI, which has the potential to become the
most successful citizens’ initiative so far,” said Efler. “If the Brussels
bureaucracy thinks that this is how it can stop people’s protests against TTIP
and CETA, then it is mistaken. We will not allow the Commission to tie our
hands. ”
Prof. Dr. Bernhard Kempen, a German law professor
from the University of Cologne, is very
clear in his legal opinion on the EU Commission’s ruling, carried out at the
request of the proposers of the ECI, and in his conclusions on page 22 his view is completely the opposite
to that of the EU Commission.
The TTIP Wooden Horse
If it is not stopped the EU soon
intends to sign these two far-reaching trade agreements. The negotiations were
based on mandates written by the EU Commission and approved by the Council of
Ministers.
The official line is that this will create jobs and increase economic growth. But the study that was commissioned by the EU itself predicted an increase in economic growth, averaged over the whole of the EU of only 0.5% by 2030.
The real beneficiaries of these agreements, however,will not be citizens but big corporations, who will be given wide ranging rights to challenge democratically validated standards, laws and decisions:
The official line is that this will create jobs and increase economic growth. But the study that was commissioned by the EU itself predicted an increase in economic growth, averaged over the whole of the EU of only 0.5% by 2030.
The real beneficiaries of these agreements, however,will not be citizens but big corporations, who will be given wide ranging rights to challenge democratically validated standards, laws and decisions:
- Investor-State-Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Canadian and US companies would have the right to sue the EU for damages if they believe that they have suffered losses because of government decisions (for instance new laws to protect the environment or consumer rights).
- Improving or even maintaining our standards for food, labour rights, environmental protection and consumer rights will become much harder.
- Liberalisation and privatisation would effectively become irreversible.
- The EU and its member states would come under pressure to allow risky technologies such as fracking or genetic modification.
- CETA and TTIP would increase the power of multinationals at the expense of democracy and the public
Please sign the European
Citizens Initiative here http://stop-ttip.org/sign/
0 comments:
Post a Comment